The Nation of Islam has released the full text of The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan’s letter to the National Director of the Anti-Defamation League, Abraham H. Foxman. The letter dated June 24, 2010 was sent with copies of two newly released books by the Nation of Islam’s Historical Research Department, The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, Volume 2: How Jews Gained Control of the Black American Economy and Jews Selling Blacks: Slave Sale Advertising by American Jews. Additionally, he sent copies of the books and the letter to all of the heads of the major influential Jewish organizations.
Full text of the letter:
Minister Louis Farrakhan
NATIONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE HONORABLE ELIJAH MUHAMMAD
AND
THE NATION OF ISLAM
IN THE NAME OF ALLAH, THE BENEFICENT, THE MERCIFUL.
I BEAR WITNESS THAT THERE IS NO GOD BUT ALLAH AND I BEAR
WITNESS THAT MUHAMMAD IS HIS MESSENGER
June 24, 2010
President Abraham Foxman
Anti-Defamation League
605 Third Avenue
New York, New York 10017
Dear Mr. Foxman,
Please accept these two books enclosed from our Historical Research Department titled The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, Volume 2: How Jews Gained Control of the Black American Economy and Jews Selling Blacks: Slave Sale Advertising by American Jews.
The charge of anti-Semitism has been leveled against the Honorable Elijah Muhammad, Malcolm X and the Nation of Islam for many years. For twenty-five of the thirty-three years of my rebuilding of the Nation of Islam, I and we, in the Nation of Islam have suffered under the charge of “anti-Semitism” because I have dared to be critical of what I and many others feel is Jewish behavior that has ill-affected Black people and others.
Our Nation of Islam Historical Research Team was motivated by these false charges to study the works of Jewish scholars, historians, and Rabbis, being very careful to omit any words written or spoken, no matter how truthful, by those who are considered “anti-Semitic.”
We can now present to our people and the world a true, undeniable record of the relationship between Blacks and Jews from their own mouths and pens. These scholars, Rabbis and historians have given to us an undeniable record of Jewish anti-Black behavior, starting with the horror of the trans-Atlantic slave trade, plantation slavery, Jim Crow, sharecropping, the labor movement of the North and South, the unions and the misuse of our people that continues to this very moment.
As you have constantly labeled me and done everything within your power to hinder me and us from the civilizing work that Allah (God) has given to The Honorable Elijah Muhammad and myself to do, I ask you to find one act committed by me or those who follow me that has injured one Jewish person, stopped Jews from doing business, hindered their education, injured their families, sullied or desecrated their synagogues. You will not find one. So, except for our willingness to tell the truth and our unwillingness to apologize to you for telling the truth, on what basis do you charge me and us as being “anti-Semitic”?
Armed with this knowledge from the pens of Jewish scholars, Rabbis, and historians, we could now charge you with the most vehement anti-Black behavior in the annals of our history in America and the world. We could charge you with being the most deceitful so-called friend, while your history with us shows you have been our worst enemy.
I do not write this with vitriol, hatred, bitterness, or a spirit of vengeance, because One greater than you and me has permitted this for His own wise purposes.
However, what is done is done. We cannot change the past. You and I, your children and mine, your people and mine are living in the present. Your present reality is sitting on top of the world in power, with riches and influence, while the masses of my people here in America, in the Caribbean, Central and South America and elsewhere in the world are in the worst condition of any member of the human family.
I have pleaded with you over the years for a sensible, intelligent dialogue. You have rejected me, and some Rabbis have given me terms for friendship that any self-respecting person could never accept. So with this truth in our hands and yours, and soon in the hands of tens of thousands, I again ask you for a dialogue.
You are in a position to help me in the civilizing work that The Honorable Elijah Muhammad was given to do by Allah (God), whose burden and Mission–Allah and He–has made me to share. With this historical research in your hands, you may either gather your forces for an all-out struggle against me, the Nation of Islam, and the truth that I and we speak and write, or as an intelligent and civilized people, we can sit down and carve out a way forward that can obliterate the stain of the past and render us, Jews and Blacks–before Allah (God) and the world–in a new, honorable, and mutually respectful relationship.
This is an offer asking you and the gentiles whom you influence to help me in the repair of my people from the damage that has been done by your ancestors to mine. This is a wonderful way of the present generation of Jews to escape the Judgment of Allah (God) by aiding in the repair of His people.
However, should you choose to make our struggle to civilize our people more difficult, then I respectfully warn you, in the Name of Allah (God) and His Messiah, The Honorable Elijah Muhammad, that the more you fight and oppose me rather than help me to lift my people from their degraded state, Allah (God) and His Messiah will bring you and your people to disgrace and ruin and destroy your power and influence here and throughout the world.
I pray that you will make the wise and best choice.
Respectfully and Sincerely Submitted,
The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan
Servant to the Lost-Found
Nation of Islam in the West
Cc: Chairman Alan Solow, American Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations
President William Hess, American Zionist Movement
President Bob Elman, American Jewish Committee
President Dennis W. Glick, B’nai B’rith International
President Richard S. Gordon, American Jewish Congress
President Rabbi Moshe Kletenik, Rabbinical Council of America
President Rabbi Ellen Weinburg Dreyfus, Central Conference of American Rabbis
Executive Director Jerry Silverman, Jewish Federation of North America
President Stephen J. Savitsky, Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America
Executive Director Martin Schwartz, Jewish Labor Committee
President Lee Rosenberg, American Israel Public Affairs Committee
President Wayne Firestone, Hillel: The Foundation for Jewish Campus Life
National Executive Director Herb Rosenbleeth, Jewish War Veterans of the United States of America
President Morton Klein, Zionist Organization of America
Executive Director Jeremy Ben-Ami, J Street
Enclosures
Julian Assange Takes A Big Hit At Queen Elizabeth, What She Did Is UNBELIEVABLE
28/09/2017
The Money Power, Stephen Goodson tells us, and wanted to achieve independence for South Africa. He commissioned the Hoek Report from Professor Piet Hoek of Pretoria University, and the report showed that the Anglo American Corporation controlled the English language newspapers and 70% of all companies in South Africa, while paying 10% of the tax.
Whites in South Africa are 10th-14th generation South African and only about 10% of Blacks can say that.
Steve Hofmeyr - Discrimination?
Steve Hofmeyr recorded a brilliant message in which he challenges the apparent oppression black people experience. Here's the truth. Black people (in the West) are not oppressed, and to say they are, is cultural Marxist nonsense. Sure, there are oppressed black people, but you'll need to look at central to northern Africa. And the oppression is not committed by white people. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6jTuB... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnPib... JERM WARFARE SPONSORS Dear SA - https://dearsouthafrica.co.za Southern Cross - http://www.sccc.co.za Buffelsfontein - https://baard-olie.co.za Forklift Direct - https://forklift.direct Caloroso Coffee: https://www.caloroso.co.za
Steve Hofmeyr Crucified, yet Julius Malema Still Allowed to Participate in Elections??!
The White Afrikaan History in South Africa.
Jan van Riebeeck by Charles Bell
History of White South Africa
History will tell you that many whites in South Africa are 10th-14th generation South African and only about 10% of Blacks can say that - most of them are 1st to 6th generation South African.
White Genocide in South Africa
White killings in South Africa.
The TRUTH about apartheid | Paul Kruger and Jonas Nilsson
Paul Kruger the lawyer from the VVK, is the author to the Memorandum The book can be purchased on: http://www.vvk.co.za/babies
White people know they didn't steal the land, what blows my mind away is where the black people get that idea from? Funding from a corrupt organisation with a clear agenda, to create chaos for their own purpose. To enrich themselves more and cripple the people even more without them knowing it. Everyone focus on RACISM these days but fails to ask why these people do this. Cyril Rhamaphosa is stinking rich, so is Zuma, Malema well on his way. ....and the people are to stupid that these people they are treating as gods, are the ones who are going to rob them blind without even knowing. ZUMA all over.
For more information on the white killings go to the following link:
White European Holocaust, Update 2
"Karin Ann Smith is an expat South African living in Texas. She studied Nursing at Grey's Hospital in Pietermaritzburg and worked in the Casino industry and for the biggest supermarket chain in South Africa, both upper management positions dealing with the Unions. She has been an activist calling for world attention to the genocide of the Boer people in South Africa for at least 10 years. Her family fled the civil war in Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) and eventually settled as farmers in South Africa, where her family of 5 siblings and both parents have suffered attacks by AK47 wielding gangs twice in the last 3 years, resulting in the death of her father last September. Karin talks about the history of South Africa during the days of the Dutch East India Company when the Cape of Good Hope was developed. She explains the early clash of the nomadic Boors and the African Zulu Nation along with the British colonization of the mineral rich region. We discuss the 1948 establishment of the Republic of South Africa by the National party, when apartheid laws were instituted as a way to maintain the peace between the minority White Afrikaners, the ruling Boers and warring indigenous Black tribes. Karin explains the political interests of the African National Congress (ANC) and underscores the track records of its communist faction, Joe Slovo, and the founder of the Armed Wing, Nelson Mandela. She also gives details related to the slow decline and decimation of the once predominately White South Africa, where taxpayer dollars cannot support the globalist takeover of a country lacking viable commerce from its majority population. Karin highlights some of the post-apartheid sanctions instituted by the ANC, along with the bigger picture of hatred towards Whites that has been stirred up by the ANC and their allies, the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), led by Julius Malema. We consider the unique situation of present-day South Africa, where the reality of its brutally anti-White environment is strangely left out of any mainstream global report. We discuss the dire circumstances of Afrikaner squatter camps and government edicts that keep White citizens jobless, uneducated, and under the constant threat of illness and violent crimes against them."
REDICE TV
Karin Smith - The Real Story of South Africa
"South African history on this first settlers to migrate north from the English ruled Cape Colony at the most southern tip, before becoming the South African republic."
South Africa - The Battle of Blood River - 16 Des 1838
These video carries forward memories of Afrikaanse defence forces
Wars Against Whites in South Africa
"Its funny how many wars white South Africans fought for this country... but its all forgotten, my dad was here, at the age of 16... remember him having nightmares about this."
"Online history video on the battle of Spion Kop, the bloodiest battle of the Anglo Boer War in South Africa 1899 - 1902, where Winston Churchill reported that up to seven bombs per minute were landing on top of the Spion Kop mountain with massive clouds of orange lydite and that the British soldiers in the trenches were being blown to atoms. Known as the 'Acre of Massacre', it remains the smallest piece of ground on which more men lost their lives in a single battle than any battle fought anywhere in the world… and it is here, witnessing what the human race was capable of, that the seeds of Mahatma Gandhi’s passive resistance took root. Leading up to this moment in history are some of South Africa’s major historical events going as far back as 1652, including: The arrival of the first settlers in South Africa and the origins of the Afrikaner people Conflicts in the history of South Africa: 1652 – 1902 Black/White and British/Boer conflicts in South Africa: 1652 – 1902. Presented by South African Military Historian Ray Heron from Spion Kop Lodge and produced by Tekweni TV Productions This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
South African History 1652 -1902 Culminating in the Anglo Boer War & Battle at Spion Kop
First Boer War
First Boer War - From Bronkhorstspruit to Majuba 1880-81
Songs in memory of White European Afrikaan defense forces
Steek die Vure aan - Bok van Blerk
DIE KAPLYN - BOK VAN BLERK (VAN CD - "AFRIKANERHART" -BLOG www.diekaplyn.co.za))
"From 1966 to 1989 The South African Defense Force (SADF) fought a war on the border between Angola and South West Africa (today known as Namibia). This 23 year conflict is today referred to as the Forgotten War".
"During this period every single white South African son was forced, through the Conscript System, to serve at first, one, then later two years as soon as they left school. A total of 715 South African Soldiers gave their lives to protect their country."
Suid-Afrikaanse Weermag: Ons was goeie kamerade
For twenty-three years, five western nations, members of the Soviet block and two superpowers were locked into a war never formally declared. The South African Defence Force and the CIA backed UNITA pitted against communist Angolans, SWAPO, Cubans, and Russians.
ANGOLA THE WAR Documentary Teaser
South African Boer War Documentaries
The Battle of Bronkhorstspruit was the first major clash of the First Boer War. It was a battle between a British army column and a group of Boers, fought by the Bronkhorstspruit River, a few miles east of the town of Bronkhorstspruit, Transvaal on 20 December 1880.
Into Angola - AL J Venter (1981-82)
F.W De klerk talks about South African Nukes.
Other article links
Please check the following articles
Teach White Europeans About Their Ice Age Heritage
White European Racial Pride. What Race Are You ?
White History, Music, Wars, Dances and Film Archives
Whites Fight Back Against Racism & Bigotry
Lauren Southern on South Africa: FARMLANDS (Are Whites History?)
Media Ownership: The Illusion of Choice
White Organizations: European Community Based Organizations
Citizens Initiative Referendas ( CIR ) For WE the People
25/9/2017D/p
Why Is It Always JEWISH Groups Trying to SHUT DOWN Free Speech?
Zuckerberg and Deep State Control
The Tommy Robinson Interview That Got Me Banned From The U.K.
Using the Refugee Migration Crisis to Build the New World Order
The Attack on Black America, Minister Louis Farrakhan, and the Nation of Islam
NOI Research Group
The Honorable Elijah Muhammad once said to me,
“Brother, you cannot fathom the depth of Satan.”
The history of Jewish espionage against Black American citizens is long and deep, and it began long before the Nation of Islam was founded by Master Fard Muhammad in 1930. Jewish agents seeking to maintain control over the rate and direction of Black progress infiltrated the NAACP leadership from the very start, forcing it into political subservience and funneling its internal documents to US government officials. These same malignant Jewish forces worked for the demise of the Marcus Garvey movement, the largest Black independence movement of that time. In 1942, agents employed by the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith infiltrated the Nation of Islam temple in Chicago and instigated the arrest of 82 law-abiding Muslims. A couple of years before that, a secret ADL memo to the FBI supplied contact information of nearly 1,600 ADL members to serve as informants and undercover sources. When the FBI established the notorious and illegal Counter-Intelligence Program (COINTELPRO) under J. Edgar Hoover in 1956, it was Jewish Assistant Director Alex Rosen whose name was on the FBI’s secret memos detailing the FBI’s plans and actions to undermine the work of many Black leaders and organizations, including the NAACP, the Black Panthers, Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, and the Honorable Elijah Muhammad.
It was no surprise, then, when the Anti-Defamation League under Abraham Foxman was caught red-handed surveilling at least 12,000 progressive individuals and 950 organizations, including the NAACP, Greenpeace, the Arab-American Anti-Discrimination Committee, and, of course, the Nation of Islam. The ADL was particularly focused on the pro-Palestinian and anti-apartheid movements and supplied their spy files to South Africa’s notorious secret police. All of this ADL espionage proved that the American government had simply privatized its race hate policies, handing over its anti-Black spy activities to the far more experienced Jewish leadership.
Those who know the history of Jewish manipulations of Black affairs immediately suspected that the recently intensified claims of “black anti-Semitism” were false and could readily see the fingerprints of a Jewish espionage operation. It came like a flood starting about a year ago: A decade-old photo of President Barack Obama with the Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan became a Jewish media obsession; this was followed by vicious attacks on Rep. Keith Ellison, Omarosa Manigault Newman, and the Congressional Black Caucus. In quick succession came the Jewish brutalization of Tamika Mallory, Linda Sarsour, Marc Lamont Hill, Alice Walker, Angela Davis, Michelle Alexander, the new US Representatives Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar, and a string of all-Black others. Wild and unsupportable charges of “anti-Semitism” came simultaneously and hysterically from Jewish sources like the ADL, the Southern Poverty Law Center, the Simon Wiesenthal Center, the Tablet, the Forward, and Jewish media figures like Jake Tapper and the well-known media shyster Alan Dershowitz.
Now we find that all the above-mentioned American citizens were the victims of a sophisticated operation directed from the highest reaches of a foreign government—Israel. A bold and unprecedented documentary titled The Lobby, produced by Al Jazeera, is now unveiling the full extent of this illegal Jewish espionage operation. Undercover reporters with hidden cameras posing as pro-Israel zealots worked their way into the leadership of this elaborate Israeli operation called “Israel Cyber Shield.” In four hour-long segments these reporters made some stunning video revelations. So damning were these reports to Israel’s leadership that Israeli officials and Alan Dershowitz acting on Israel’s behalf made herculean efforts to block its release. The internet won out and the full criminal Israeli enterprise is now exposed. Its target and focus are Black American youth and Islam.
To a room “packed with Israeli diplomats,” Judith Varnai Shorer, the Israeli consul general in Atlanta, Georgia, is filmed saying this:
When one considers the implications of that statement, it is unprecedented in all of Black American history. A foreign government has announced that an entire generation of Black youth in another nation 5,700 miles away—not the nation itself, but an oppressed sub-population within that friendly nation—is its “major problem.” Top Israeli officials sitting on a stage in America are on film asserting that American Black youth are the enemy of Israel!
The San Francisco consul for Israel, Andy David, followed Shorer’s astonishing proclamation by revealing that he had personally recruited a former acquaintance of Martin Luther King Jr. to write three articles in the Huffington Post “explaining why their [Black Lives Matter’s] agenda was hijacked.”
The fact that no United States official or agency or private “civil rights” or media organization has investigated this actual proof of foreign espionage against US citizens is flagrant confirmation of the Israeli role in controlling American political affairs. After more than a year of US recriminations about suspected Russian “election hacking” and “foreign influence” and “collusion,” Israeli operatives are admitting that Israel is the culprit—and, shockingly, the only response from American politicians and news outlets is silence.
This underscores quite directly the words of the Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan in 1989, when he looked into the hearts of Black youth and imparted these warning words:
“I say it again, the Government of the United States of America is planning an assault on the Black community, specifically aimed at our youth. And the conspiracy is so deep and so diabolical that many of you will not even believe that at this very moment that I am talking to you, your lives hang in the balance, whether you are living in Chicago, Detroit, Boston, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles, or any city in America. Black youth, particularly Black young men, are at risk today….‘Could this be possible? Farrakhan, are you making this up?’ Even though consciously you may not wish to agree with me, in your subconscious mind, you know something deeply wicked and diabolical is going on. Now let me, by God’s Grace, point it out to you.”
The Lobby documentary backs every word The Minister said and further names names, motives, financiers, and tactics. On film, Sima Vaknin-Gil, director general of Israel Ministry of Strategic Affairs, reveals in a meeting of pro-Israel lobbyists:
“We [Israel] are a different government working on foreign soil and we have to be very, very cautious. WE HAVE THREE DIFFERENT SUB-CAMPAIGNS which are very, very sensitive regarding data gathering, information analysis, working on activist organizations’ money trail. This is something that only a country, with its resources, can do the best.” [Emphasis ours]
Vaknin-Gil boasts of how the Israeli serpent snakes around the globe:
“What we’ve done is mapped and analyzed the whole phenomenon globally. Not just the United States, not just campuses, but campuses and intersectionality and labor unions and churches…”
The Israelis target college students for special attention. Two operatives of the Israel on Campus Coalition are filmed bragging of their success “naming and shaming” pro-Palestinian activists with slander and dirty tricks. Jacob Baime and Ian Hersh say they have devised “custom algorithms” to hunt down their opponents on social media in their “psychological warfare” operation. “It drives them crazy,” says Hersh. “They either shut down or they spend time responding to it and investigating it, which is time they can’t spend attacking Israel. So, that’s incredibly effective.”
So false issues—such as the Obama photo with The Minister, the absurd focus on his “termite” statement, and other invented controversies—are simply diversionary smoke bombs that create confusion so Israel can continue its apartheid and warmongering in the dark.
Jews Baime and Hersh say their budget is “massive,” and that they have “major political consulting firms on retainer that are here all the time. We have our own opposition researchers.”
Listen to Baime and Hersh describe the tactics of their campus attack squad:
“Generally, within about 30 seconds or less of one of these things popping up on campus, whether it’s a Facebook event, whether it’s the right kind of mention on Twitter, the system picks it up, it goes into a queue and alerts our researchers and they evaluate it. They tag it, and if it rises to a certain level, we issue early-warning alerts to our partners….With the anti-Israel people, what we found has been most effective, in the last year, you do the opposition research, put up an anonymous website. Then put up targeted Facebook ads.”
Now, let us review the following description of Tamika Mallory‘s recent visit to the University of North Carolina/Asheville, as reported by the director of the school’s Center for Jewish Studies, Richard Chess:
“It didn’t take long before word spread on the internet and media outlets throughout the U.S. and in Israel of Mallory’s upcoming talk at UNC Asheville. The headlines:
“UNC Asheville Hosts Farrakhan-Tied Women’s March Leader for MLK Day Speech” (Breitbart);
“OUTRAGEOUS! Women’s March co-president Tamika Mallory will deliver a keynote address January 24th as a part of UNC Asheville annual Martin Luther King Jr. Week” (CAMERA on Campus);
“Tamika Mallory Irks North Carolina Jews With MLK Day Speech In Asheville” (The Forward);
“For UNC, Silent Sam = HATE, while Farrakhan is OK” (The Daily Haymaker);
“UNC-Asheville, What More Do You Need? – Tamika Mallory Still Won’t Condemn Farrakhan’s Anti-Semitism – Rescind Her Invite to Keynote at MLK Event” (Zionist Organization of America).
And the emails and phone calls–some reasonable, some angry and threatening–pressuring the university to disinvite Ms. Mallory came in by the hundreds.
It cannot be doubted that Operation “Israel Cyber Shield” is the source of all these attacks on Tamika Mallory, the Black students of that campus, and The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan.
American Zionists Baime and Hersh then tie their US espionage directly to its military source:
“It’s modeled on General Stanley McChrystal’s counter-insurgency strategy in Iraq. We’ve copied a lot from that strategy that has been working really well for us actually.”
In 2011, US Gen. McChrystal released a report about his psychological operations strategy to combat what he calls “Islamic insurgents” with a propaganda campaign of false and vicious lies and mass deceptions about the Afghanistan population. Read carefully McChrystal’s words and one can readily see the correlation between the US government’s tactics against the Afghanistan people and those currently being deployed by Israel against Black Americans:
Offensive Information Operations must be used to target Insurgent networks in order to disrupt and degrade their operational effectiveness, while also offering opportunities for lower level insurgent reintegration….A more forceful and offensive Strategic Communication approach must be devised whereby Insurgents are exposed continually for their cultural and religious violations, anti-Islamic and indiscriminate use of violence and terror, and by concentrating on their vulnerabilities. These include their causing of the majority of civilian casualties, attacks on education, development projects, and government institutions, and flagrant contravention of the principles of the Koran. These vulnerabilities must be expressed in a manner that exploits the cultural and ideological separation of the Insurgents from the vast majority of the Afghan population.
Gen. McChrystal is not saying that he would investigate and honestly report alleged “cultural and religious violations”; rather, he is saying that “violations” will be invented and slanderously applied to the Afghan people to create animosities and divisions that the US can then exploit to control the region. “Israel Cyber Shield” has religiouslyfollowed McChrystal’s divide-and-conquer strategy. McChrystal then discusses the danger of prison “radicalization” in Afghanistan, with direct implications, of course, for the NOI prison programs—the most effective reform program ever devised:
Currently, Taliban and Al Qaeda…detainees are currently radicalizing non-insurgent inmates and worsening an already overcrowded prison system. Hardened, committed Islamists are indiscriminately mixed with petty criminals and sex offenders, and they are using the opportunity to radicalize and indoctrinate them.
Al Jazeera’s The Lobby unveils the racist mind of white Jewish Supremacy and uncovers the tactics that Israel has deployed against Black America at this very moment. It is as if we—the Black targets of this treachery—had bugged the office of J. Edgar Hoover and Alex Rosen as they plotted the COINTELPRO harassment and murders of our Black civil rights leaders. The massive Jewish role in the trans-Atlantic slave trade, in Jim Crow, in cotton trading and sharecropping, in Hollywood race-hate propaganda, in false-flag operations, and in myriad other oppressions is today only continued by other, high-tech means.
The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan makes a very profound distinction when speaking of Jewish misbehavior, targeting what John the Revelator called “Jews who say they are Jews but are not.” It is the very same distinction that The Reverend Billy Graham made in advising President Richard M. Nixon when Graham explained: “The Bible talks about two kinds of Jews.” The Holy Quran (3:77) makes that same distinction:
“And there is certainly a party of them who lie about the Book that you may consider it to be a part of the Book while it is not a part of the Book; and they say it is from Allah, while it is not from Allah; and they forge a lie against Allah whilst they know.”
The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan has been attacked brutally for alluding to those exact same distinctions made by both Jesus and His most prominent disciple Billy Graham. Minister Farrakhan explains:
“I am not talking about good Jews who keep the Sabbath and who try to live the life the Torah taught. I am talking to those rebellious ones that take the wisdom of God and use it for Satanic purposes….You are the one whose covers must be pulled off; you are the one that our people must fall away from quickly lest you take them down to hell with yourself.”
From Jesus to a series of Popes, to Martin Luther, to Billy Graham, to Farrakhan, world leaders brave enough to speak plainly have made a clear distinction between the two peoples claiming to be Judaism’s upholders of the faith. But when a room filled with high-ranking Israeli officials—all claiming they are Jews—proclaim that a whole generation of Blacks is their dire enemy, where are the Jewish voices of disgust, of rebuke, of condemnation?
How Black America—its youth, students, church leaders, organizations, and leadership—confronts and repels these Jewish agents of repression is now NUMBER 1 on the Black Agenda.
Muhammad the founder of Islam (Muslim faith) in the Middle East was a white man.
The non Muslim religions all over the world don’t necessarily consider Muhammad a prophet; he is still revered by Muslims as a Prophet of God (Allah).
Prescription: Muhammad wasTall, White skin Caucasian Man.
If you hate white people then you hate Muhammad the Prophet because he was White.
Muhammad " never wanted his face to be drawn or sculptured as he was strictly against idol worshiping. He knew people would start worshiping him if they find his portrayal."
Despite there being a popular understanding that depictions of the Prophet are forbidden, they still exist.
Are there really no historical images of Muhammad?
The following quote taken from the article above:
"In my search for historic images of Muhammad, I uncovered early historic paintings and depictions clearly show Muhammad was not dark skinned.
Yet, philosophy lecturer, David Wood, points out in his article, If Blacks Read These Islamic Texts about Muhammad, They’d Never be Muslims on website Mad News | Welcome, the Quran highlights Muhammad’s white skin.
David Wood cites:
“I said to him, ‘Did you see the Messenger of Allah?’ He said, ‘Yes, he was white with an elegant face’” (Muslim 43)
…the whiteness of his shins (Ahmad 15273)
…the whiteness of the thighs of Allah’s Prophet (Bukhari 371)
…the whiteness of his stomach (Bukhari 2837)
,,,the whiteness of his armpits of the Messenger of Allah (Majah 881)
Wood wrote:
"According to his closest companions and most dedicated followers, Muhammad was so white, he was clearly identifiable by his white features."
Ahmad ibn Abi Sulayman, the companion of Sahnun said, “Anyone who says that the Prophet was black should be killed."
I saw the whiteness of the thigh of the Prophet.
Qur'an, Hadith and Scholars:Muhammad's White Complexion
The following quotes taken from above articles:
"Narrated Abu Juhaifa: By chance I went to the Prophet at noon while he was at Al-Abtah (resting) in a tent. Bilal came out (of the tent) and pronounced the Adhan for the prayer, and entering again, he brought out the water which was left after Allah's Apostle had performed the ablution. The people rushed to take some of the water. Bilal again went in and brought out a spear-headed stick, and then Allah's Apostle came out. As if I were now looking at the whiteness of his leg. Bilal fixed the stick and the Prophet offered a two-Rakat Zuhr prayer and a two-Rak'at 'Asr prayer, while women and donkeys were passing in front of the Prophet (beyond the stick).Sahih Bukhari 4:56:767"
"Narrated 'Abdul 'Aziz: Anas said, 'When Allah's Apostle invaded Khaibar, we offered the Fajr prayer there yearly in the morning) when it was still dark. The Prophet rode and Abu Talha rode too and I was riding behind Abu Talha. The Prophet passed through the lane of Khaibar quickly and my knee was touching the thigh of the Prophet . He uncovered his thigh and I saw the whiteness of the thigh of the Prophet. When he entered the town, he said, 'Allahu Akbar! Khaibar is ruined..."
"'Amir b. Sa'd reported: I saw the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) pronouncing taslim on his right and on his left till I saw the whiteness of his cheek."
Interesting quotes from the Hadith about Muhammad
Narrated Anas bin Malik: While we were sitting with the Prophet (ﷺ) in the mosque, a man came riding on a camel. He made his camel kneel down in the mosque, tied its foreleg and then said: "Who amongst you is Muhammad?" At that time the Prophet (ﷺ) was sitting amongst us (his companions) leaning on his arm. We replied, "This white man reclining on his arm." The man then addressed him, "O Son of `Abdul Muttalib." The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "I am here to answer your questions." The man said to the Prophet, "I want to ask you something and will be hard in questioning. So do not get angry." The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "Ask whatever you want." The man said, "I ask you by your Lord, and the Lord of those who were before you, has Allah sent you as an Apostle to all the mankind?" The Prophet (ﷺ) replied, "By Allah, yes." The man further said, "I ask you by Allah. Has Allah ordered you to offer five prayers in a day and night (24 hours).? He replied, "By Allah, Yes." The man further said, "I ask you by Allah! Has Allah ordered you to observe fasts during this month of the year (i.e. Ramadan)?" He replied, "By Allah, Yes." The man further said, "I ask you by Allah. Has Allah ordered you to take Zakat (obligatory charity) from our rich people and distribute it amongst our poor people?" The Prophet (ﷺ) replied, "By Allah, yes." Thereupon that man said, "I have believed in all that with which you have been sent, and I have been sent by my people as a messenger, and I am Dimam bin Tha`laba from the brothers of Bani Sa`d bin Bakr." Sahih Bukhari 1:3:63
Comments
Three Quran Verses Every Christian Should Know (David Wood)
Muhammad The Prophet - What Does The Bible Say About Islam in Bible Prophecy
Jewish Female Killed Muhammad
"Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: The last hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him; but the tree Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews."
Sahih Muslim 41:6985, see also Sahih Bukhari 4:56:791
Dealing with Death Threats (David Wood)
Fact-Checking "10 Lies You Were Told about Islam" (Part 1)
Recently, AllTime10s posted a video titled "10 Lies You Were Told about Islam" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kq4BF...).
The video attempts to respond to various false claims made about Islam and Muslims. However, the "research" for the video was incredibly sloppy, and a number of false statements were made. For instance, "10 Lies You Were Told about Islam" insists that Pew Research has found that only .006625% of Muslims "identify with extremism." This claim, however, doesn't come from Pew Research. It comes from the blog of Dave Cecil, who clearly didn't understand the CNN article he was reading. Ironically, the link provided by AllTimeTens refutes the claim in the video. With such shoddy video research, it's clear that the video makers need to be more careful.
PATREON: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=3615911 PAYPAL: https://www.paypal.me/Acts17Apologetics TWITTER: https://twitter.com/Acts17 FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?... MINDS: https://www.minds.com/Acts17Apologetics WEBSITE: http://www.acts17.net
08/03/2019A
Coveners League has many articles, here is a small sample, please check them out.
Teach White Europeans About Their Ice Age Heritage
White European Racial Pride. What Race Are You ?
White History, Music, Wars, Dances and Film Archives
Whites Fight Back Against Racism & Bigotry
European Birth Rate Statistics. Update 2
The Coudenhove-Kalergi plan - To Genocide Indigenous Europeans in Europe
Europe & Middle Eastern Wildlife. Update 2
Lauren Southern on South Africa: FARMLANDS (Are Whites History?)
Lauren Southern on South Africa: FARMLANDS (Are Whites History?)
Media Ownership: The Illusion of Choice
White Organizations: European Community Based Organizations
Citizens Initizens Referendums ( CIR ) in Switzerland
Did The Sexual Revolution Actually Benefit Women? Mary Eberstadt | Modern Wisdom
Women ARE Disproportionately Hurting Our Country
Dennis Prager (Jewish) went viral on Twitter yesterday over the title of his recent column for the Daily Signal “Women Are Disproportionately Hurting Our Country.” People lost their minds and issued all sorts of attacks on Dennis, but did they actually look at the substance of the article? Let's look at what Dennis wrote and see if the outrage is truly justified.
Why Do You Think You Deserve A King When You're Not A Queen?
How Miley Cyrus And Cardi B Are Destroying Healthy Relationships For Women
Owen and Gina Bontempo discuss all the ways that modern relationships are being destroyed by the religion of modern toxic feminism.
Media Mocks Wife For DARING To Take Care Of Husband
Building Family Bonds Through Love and History by Jenny Wise
Special Home Educator – For Fellow Home Educators
Have you ever wondered about your family’s origin and ancestors? For many of us, our grandparents are our last line of connection to their parents and grandparents. I’m lucky to still have my grandmother to help fill in a lot of the blanks for me. Through her, I’ve learned a lot about our family tree, not to mention that having a deeper relationship with my grandmother has helped me throughout my life.
I’ve been working with my children on creating a family tree and forging stronger relationships with their grandparents. They are learning a lot about family history, and they are being introduced to ideas and traditions we can incorporate and keep passing through the family -- kind of like creating genealogical heirlooms.
10 Tips to Start Your Family History Journey
HomeGet started10 tips to start your family history journe
How to Trace Your Family Tree
Bond Between Grandparents and Grandkids Benefits Both
http://www.siparent.com/parenting-articles/bond-between-grandparents-and-grandkids-benefits-both/
The Grandparent's Guide to Sharing Your Love of Classic Cars with Your Grandchild
12 Great Activities for Grandparents and Grandchildren ...
The Best Legacy You Can Leave for Your Grandchildren
The Best Legacy You Can Leave for Your Grandchildren
12/9/2017
78 years after they were allegedly ‘gassed’ by the Nazis, the remains of the bodies of 286 Jews, mostly women and children, were found in a basement under the market square in the town of Stanov in Khmelnytsky Oblast, Ukraine:
The remains of the bodies were collected in sacks – and these will be buried in a mass grave in the city’s ancient Jewish cemetery.
According to KGB documents and testimonies of Jews returning to the city after the war, on the night of May 14-15, 1942, the Nazis rounded up 286 Jews, mostly women and children, and put them in two cellars – where they killed them with gas. “The Nazis did not even use With bullets and killed the Jews with terrible cruelty in the cellars, “says Rabbi Alexander Feingold, rabbi of the Khmelnytsky and Ternopil districts in Ukraine, where about 7,000 Jews.
After the war, the cellars were opened, but it was decided to leave the bodies in place with a sign indicating that they had been murdered by the Nazis. Above the basements was a ruined house, and over the years the entrances to them disappeared. A large market operated for many years.
For the past six years, Rabbi Feingold has waged a struggle with the authorities and with the landowners to allow him to search for the remains of the bodies and remove them. The landowner refused, and the community waged a legal battle against him in which they lost. Eventually, they were able to reach an agreement with him and the community took ownership of the land.
In 2019, searches began at the site, and one of the basements was discovered. About 200 sacks were collected at the site, including human bones. “We brought in experts from Israel and the Ukraine and we could not find the second basement,” says Rabbi Feingold. “It was very hard work. We did a lot of drilling and lifted the ground with bulldozers, but we didn’t find any. At some point we were already discouraged. About two weeks ago we made another attempt, and then we managed to find the second basement opening.”
In the basement were the remains of the bodies of the Jews, along with pieces of clothing, children’s shoes, and even parts of arrangement with which they went to their deaths. “It was very difficult to collect the remains because they were connected to the ground. We also found a mezuzah house there, and from this we conclude that above the basement was a house of Jews.
We keep all the bags in the basement, and after we finish the work we will bury them in a mass grave in the old Jewish cemetery in the city where Jews have been buried for over 500 years. When you see shoes of children aged two and three it is impossible to describe the feeling. It’s really chilling.” According to Rabbi Feingold, the community will establish a park in memory of the victims near the site of the massacre.
We know there’s something fishy with this story because the mainstream Jewish news sites don’t mention any Nazi ‘gassings’ in the basement — merely that their were ‘suffocated’ — apparently even the Jewish editors at JTA didn’t believe the preposterous ‘gassing’ allegation.
Not only that, the Yad Vashem Museum in Israel claims the victims were either ‘suffocated’ or ‘starved‘ — which should set off alarm bells for anyone who understands real Ukrainian history.
The Nazis didn’t intentionally starve anyone to death — that’s what the Jews did to the Ukrainians during Soviet farm ‘collectivization’.
And, yes, the Ukrainian men and women were often separated — which accounts for why mostly women and children were discovered in the basement.
During the 1930s, the Jewish Bolsheviks, under direct orders from the Jew Lazar Kagonovich, at least 10 million White Christian Ukrainians were intentionally starved to death in what today is known as the Holodomor — the greatest single mass murder of the 20th century.
That’s what the so-called “Holocaust” actually is — an clumsy attempt to blame the Nazis for crimes against humanity committed by Soviet Jews — before, during, and after WWII.
That’s what the Jews attempted to do with their infamous mass murder of Poles in the Katyn Forest — blame it on the ‘evil’ Nazis.
And notice the story doesn’t mention any DNA tests that were run on the bodies found in the basement — the only ‘proof’ that the bodies were Jews is that there was allegedly a ‘mezuzah’ on the door way to the house — but all that means is that a Jew probably lived in that home at some time in the past.
Of course it would be very easy to prove that these people were ‘gassed’ by the ‘Nazis’ by detecting cyanide gas — or whatever gas was available — in the hair and clothing of the victims — but no such tests, of course, were done.
That’s because there is not one shred of objective evidence that even one single Jew was ever ‘gassed’ during World War II.
And the claims of mass cremations are scientifically and physically impossible.
Here’s what really happened: the local Jewish commissar ordered the corpses of a couple hundred dead women and children who were starved to death thrown in the basement of an abandoned house formerly owned by a Jew who fled the area once the mass killing started. After the war, the Soviets didn’t want to go to the bother or expense of burying all those bodies, so they ordered the whole building bulldozed over — and if anyone asks questions, blamed it on the defeated Nazis.
And the greatest insult of this whole story is that Christian victims of Jewish genocide will be buried in a Jewish cemetery — and misidentified as ‘Jewish’ victims.
Was Hitler's Invasion of Russia Defensive, to Foil an Attack by Stalin?
" ... from the moment (Stalin) signed his long-term peace agreement with Hitler in 1939 and divided Poland, he ramped up his total-war economy to an even higher notch. Embarking upon an unprecedented military buildup, he focused his production almost entirely upon purely offensive weapons systems ... By 1941, his production cycle was complete."
|
3
SHARES
|
Share to Facebook |
Share to TwitterShare to RedditShare to VkontakteShare to MessengerShare to TelegramShare to WhatsAppShare to Email
The author is the founder and editor of the Unz Review, a conservative American political website, and a one-time candidate for the governor of California.
For many years I maintained far too many magazine subscriptions, more periodicals than I could possibly read or even skim, so most weeks they went straight into storage, with scarcely more than a glance at the cover. But every now and then, I might casually browse one of them, curious about what I had usually been missing.
Thus, in the summer of 2010, I happened to leaf through an issue of Chronicles, the small-circulation flagship organ of the marginalized paleoconservative movement, and soon began reading a blandly-titled book review. But the piece so astonished me that it immediately justified all the many years of subscription payments I had sent to that magazine.
The reviewer was Andrei Navrozov, a Soviet emigre long resident in Britain, and he opened by quoting a passage from a previous 1990 book review, published almost exactly twenty years before:
[Suvorov] is arguing with every book, every article, every film, every NATO directive, every Downing Street assumption, every Pentagon clerk, every academic, every Communist and anti-Communist, every neoconservative intellectual, every Soviet song, poem, novel and piece of music ever heard, written, made, sung, issued, produced, or born during the last 50 years. For this reason, Icebreaker is the most original work of history it has been my privilege to read.
He himself had written that earlier book review, which ran in the prestigious Times Literary Supplement following the original English publication of Icebreaker, and his description was not overblown. The work sought to overturn the settled history of World War II.
Icebreaker‘s author, writing under the pen-name Viktor Suvorov, was a veteran Soviet military intelligence officer who had defected to the West in 1978 and subsequently published a number of well-regarded books on the Soviet military and intelligence services. But here he advanced a far more radical thesis.
The “Suvorov Hypothesis” claimed that during the summer of 1941 Stalin was on the very verge of mounting a massive invasion and conquest of Europe, while Hitler’s sudden attack on June 22nd of that year was intended to forestall that looming blow. Moreover, the author also argued that Stalin’s planned attack constituted merely the final act in a much longer geopolitical strategy that he had been developing since at least the early 1930s.
Following the Bolshevik Revolution, the new Soviet regime had been viewed with extreme suspicion and hostility by other European countries, most of which also regarded their own domestic Communist Parties as likely fifth columns. So to fulfill Lenin’s dream and carry the revolution to Germany and the rest of Europe, Stalin somehow needed to split the Europeans, and break their common line of resistance. He allegedly viewed Hitler’s rise as exactly such a potential “icebreaker,” an opportunity to unleash another bloody European war and exhaust all sides, while the Soviet Union remained aloof and bided its strength, waiting for the right moment to sweep in and conquer the entire continent.
To this end, Stalin had directed his powerful German Communist Party to take political actions ensuring that Hitler came to power and then later lured the German dictator into signing the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact to divide Poland. This led Britain and France to declare war on Germany, while also eliminating the Polish buffer state, thereby placing Soviet armies directly on the German border. And from the very moment he signed that long-term peace agreement with Hitler, he abandoned all his defensive preparations, and instead embarked upon an enormous military build-up of the purely offensive forces he intended to use for European conquest. Thus according to Suvorov, Stalin ranks as “the chief culprit” behind the outbreak of World War II in Europe, and the updated English edition of his book bears that exact title.
To my great surprise I discovered that Suvorov’s remarkable theories had gained enormous worldwide prominence since 1990, and had been widely discussed almost everywhere except in America and the other English-speaking countries. As Navrozov explained:
[The English edition of the] book sold 800 copies.
Some months later, a German edition of the book, under the title Der Eisbrecher: Hitler in Stalins Kaulkul, was published in Germany by a smallish house, Klett-Cotta, to timid and gingerly reviews. It sold 8,000 copies. In 1992, Suvorov’s manuscript was delivered to a maverick publisher in Moscow, and at last the book saw the light of day in the original Russian, quickly selling out its first print run of 100,000 copies. In the years that followed, over five million copies have been sold, making Suvorov the most-read military historian in history.
And yet, in the nearly 20 years that have elapsed between Icebreaker‘s launch in England and the present publication of The Chief Culprit, no British, American, Canadian, or Australian publisher saw fit to exploit potentially global interest in the drifting Icebreaker—or to so much as touch Suvorov with a barge pole—despite the fact that the almost unobtainable $20 copies of the long-out-of print Hamish Hamilton edition have been changing hands on the internet for upward of $500.
Since 1990, Suvorov’s works have been translated into at least 18 languages and an international storm of scholarly controversy has swirled around the Suvorov Hypothesis in Russia, Germany, Israel, and elsewhere. Numerous other authors have published books in support or more often strong opposition, and even international academic conferences have been held to debate the theory. But our own English-language media has almost entirely blacklisted and ignored this ongoing international debate, to such an extent that the name of the most widely-read military historian who ever lived had remained totally unknown to me.
Finally in 2008, the prestigious Naval Academy Press of Annapolis decided to break this 18 year intellectual embargo and published an updated English edition of Suvorov’s work. But once again, our media outlets almost entirely averted their eyes, and only a single review appeared in an obscure ideological publication, where I chanced to encounter it. This conclusively demonstrates that throughout most of the twentieth century a united front of English-language publishers and media organs could easily maintain a boycott of any important topic, ensuring that almost no one in America or the rest of the Anglosphere would ever hear of it. Only with the recent rise of the Internet has this disheartening situation begun to change.
Determining Stalin’s true motives and the basis of his foreign policy during the 1930s is hardly easy, and his statements and actions are subject to multiple interpretations. Therefore, the theory that the dictator spent all those years deftly preparing the outbreak of World War II appears quite speculative to me. But the other central claim of the Suvorov Hypothesis—that the Soviets were themselves on the verge of attacking when the Germans struck—is an extremely factual question, which can be evaluated based on hard evidence. I find the case quite compelling, at least if the facts and details that Suvorov cites in support are not totally spurious, which seems unlikely with the Naval Academy Press as his publisher.
The Eastern Front was the decisive theater of World War II, involving military forces vastly larger than those deployed in the West or the Pacific, and the standard narrative always emphasizes the ineptitude and weakness of the Soviets. On June 22, 1941, Hitler launched Operation Barbarossa, a sudden, massive surprise attack on the USSR, which caught the Red Army completely unaware. Stalin has been regularly ridiculed for his total lack of preparedness, with Hitler often described as the only man the paranoid dictator had ever fully trusted. Although the defending Soviet forces were enormous in size, they were poorly led, with their officer corps still not recovered from the crippling purges of the late 1930s, and their obsolete equipment and poor tactics were absolutely no match for the modern panzer divisions of Germany’s hitherto undefeated Wehrmacht. The Russians initially suffered gigantic losses, and only the onset of winter and the vast spaces of their territory saved them from a quick defeat. After this, the war seesawed back-and-forth for four more years, until superior numbers and improved tactics finally carried the Soviets to the streets of a destroyed Berlin in 1945.
Such is the traditional understanding of the titanic Russo-German struggle that we see endlessly echoed in every newspaper, book, television documentary, and film around us. But even a cursory examination of the initial situation has always revealed strange anomalies.
Many years ago, while in Junior High, I became an avid war-gamer with a strong interest in military history, and the Eastern Front of World War II was certainly a very popular topic. But every reconstruction of Operation Barbarossa always noted that the Germans owed much of their great initial success to the very odd deployment of the huge Soviet forces, which were all massed along the border in vulnerable formations almost as if preparing for an attack, and some writers casually suggested that this might have indeed been the case. But the sheer volume of supporting evidence amassed by Suvorov goes far beyond this sort of idle speculation, and he produces a historical picture radically different than what our standard accounts have always implied.
First, although there was been a widespread belief in the superiority of Germany’s military technology, its tanks and its planes, this is almost entirely mythological. In actual fact, Soviet tanks were far superior in main armament, armor, and maneuverability to their German counterparts, so much so that the overwhelming majority of panzers were almost obsolescent by comparison. And the Soviet superiority in numbers was even more extreme, with Stalin deploying several times more tanks than the combined total of those held by Germany and every other nation in the world: 27,000 against just 4,000 in Hitler’s forces. Even during peacetime, a single Soviet factory in Kharkov produced more tanks in every six month period than the entire Third Reich had built prior to 1940. The Soviets held a similar superiority, though somewhat less extreme, in their ground-attack bombers. The totally closed nature of the USSR meant that vast military forces remained entirely hidden from outside observers.
There is also little evidence that the quality of Soviet officers or military doctrine fell short. Indeed, we often forget that history’s first successful example of a “blitzkrieg” in modern warfare was the crushing August 1939 defeat that Stalin inflicted upon the Japanese 6th Army in Outer Mongolia, relying upon a massive surprise attack of tanks, bombers, and mobile infantry. And Stalin apparently thought so highly of many of his top military strategists in 1941, that despite his huge initial losses, many of them remained in command and were eventually promoted to the highest ranks of the Soviet military establishment by the end of the war.
Certainly, many aspects of the Soviet military machine were primitive, but exactly the same was true of their Nazi opponents. Perhaps the most surprising detail about the technology of the invading Wehrmacht in 1941 was that its transportation system was still almost entirely pre-modern, relying upon wagons and carts drawn by 750,000 horses to maintain the vital flow of ammunition and replacements to its advancing armies.
Meanwhile, major categories of Soviet weapons systems seem almost impossible to explain except as important elements of Stalin’s offensive plans. Although the bulk of the Soviet armored forces were medium tanks like the T-28 and T-34, generally far superior to their German counterparts, the USSR had also pioneered the development of several lines of highly specialized tanks, most of which had no counterpart elsewhere in the world.
(*) The Soviets had produced a remarkable line of light BT tanks, easily able to shed their tracks and continue on wheels, achieving a top speed of 60 miles per hour, two or three times faster than any other comparable armored vehicle, and ideally suited to exploitation drives deep into enemy territory. However, such wheeled operation was only effective on paved highways, of which Soviet territory had none, hence were ideally suited for travel on Germany’s large network of autobahns. In 1941 Stalin deployed almost 6,500 of these autobahn-oriented tanks, more than the rest of the world’s tanks combined.
(*) For centuries, Continental conquerors from Napoleon to Hitler had been stymied by the barrier of the English Channel, but Stalin was far better prepared. Although Stalin’s vast USSR was entirely a land-power, he pioneered the world’s only series of fully amphibious light tanks, able to successfully cross large rivers, lakes, and even that notoriously wide moat last successfully traversed by William the Conqueror in 1066. By 1941, the Soviets deployed 4,000 of these amphibious tanks, far more than 3,350 German tanks of all types used in the attack. But being useless in defense, they were all ordered abandoned or destroyed.
(*) The Soviets also fielded many thousands of heavy tanks, intended to engage and defeat enemy armor, while the Germans had none at all. In direct combat, a Soviet KV-1 or KV-2 could easily destroy four or five of the best German tanks, while remaining almost invulnerable to enemy shells. Suvorov recounts the example of a KV which took 43 direct hits before finally becoming incapacitated, surrounded by the hulks of the ten German tanks it had first managed to destroy.
Other evidence of the scale and intent of Stalin’s armies in the summer of 1941 are equally telling:
(*) During the early years of World War II, the Germans effectively utilized paratroops and air-mobile forces to seize key enemy targets far behind the front lines during a major offensive, and this was an important component of their victories against France in 1940 and Greece in 1941. Such units are necessarily lightly armed and no match for regular infantry in a defensive battle; hence their only role is an offensive one. Germany entered the war with 4,000 paratroops, a far larger force than anything found in Britain, France, America, Italy, or Japan. However, the Soviets had at least 1,000,000 trained paratroopers, and Suvorov believes that the true total was actually closer to 2,000,000.
(*) Sometimes the production decisions of major weapon systems provide strong hints of the broader strategy behind their development. The most widely produced military aircraft in history was the heavily armored IL-2, a powerful Soviet ground-attack bomber that was originally designed as a two-man system, with the rear gunner able to effectively defend the plane against enemy fighters during its missions. However, Stalin personally ordered the design changed to eliminate the second man and defensive armament, which left the bomber extremely vulnerable to enemy aircraft once the war broke out. Stalin and his war-planners had seemingly banked on possessing near-total air supremacy during the entire course of any conflict, an assumption plausible only if the German luftwaffe were destroyed on the ground by a surprise attack on the very first day.
(*) There is considerable evidence that in the weeks prior to the German surprise attack, Stalin had ordered the release of many hundreds of thousands of Gulag prisoners, who were issued basic weapons and organized into NKVD-led divisions and corps, constituting a substantial part of the Second Strategic Echelon located hundreds of miles from the German border. These units may have been intended to serve as occupation troops, allowing the much more powerful front-line forces to press onward and complete the conquests of France, Italy, the Balkans, and Spain. Otherwise, I can find no other plausible explanation for Stalin’s action.
(*) The planned invasion and occupation of a large country whose population speaks a different language requires considerable logistical preparation. As an example, prior to their attack the notoriously methodical Germans printed and distributed to their troops large numbers of German-Russian basic phrasebooks, allowing effective communication with the local Slavic villagers and townsmen. Ironically enough, at around the same time, the USSR seems to have produced very similar Russian-German phrasebooks, allowing conquering Soviet troops to easily make themselves understood to German civilians. Many millions of these phrasebooks had been distributed to Soviet forces on the German border during the early months of 1941.
Suvorov’s reconstruction of the weeks directly preceding the outbreak of combat is a fascinating one, emphasizing the mirror-image actions taken by both the Soviet and German armies. Each side moved its best striking units, airfields, and ammunition dumps close to the border, ideal for an attack but very vulnerable in defense. Each side carefully deactivated any residual minefields and ripped out any barbed wire obstacles, lest these hinder the forthcoming attack. Each side did its best to camouflage their preparations, talking loudly about peace while preparing for imminent war. The Soviet deployment had begun much earlier, but since their forces were so much larger and had far greater distances to cross, they were not yet quite ready for their attack when the Germans struck, and thereby shattered Stalin’s planned conquest of Europe.
All of the above examples of Soviet weapons systems or strategic decisions seem very difficult to explain under the conventional defensive narrative, but make perfect sense if Stalin’s orientation from 1939 onward had always been an offensive one, and he had decided that summer 1941 was the time to strike and enlarge his Soviet Union to include all the European states, just as Lenin had originally intended. And Suvorov provides many dozens of additional examples, building brick by brick a very compelling case for this theory.
The book is not overly long, running perhaps 150,000 words, and $20 plus a few mouse clicks on Amazon will provide you a copy to read and judge for yourself. But for those who desire a simple summary, Suvorov’s 2009 lecture at the Eurasia Forum of the Annapolis Naval Academy is conveniently available on YouTube, though slightly hindered by his weak English:
And also his C-SPAN Book TV lectures at the Woodrow Wilson Center:
Controversial theories, even if backed by seemingly strong evidence, can hardly be properly evaluated until they have been weighed against the counter-arguments of their strongest critics, and this should certainly be the case with the Suvorov Hypothesis. But although the last three decades have seen the development of a large secondary literature, much of it sharply critical, nearly all this international debate has taken place in Russian, German, or Hebrew, languages that I do not read.
There are some exceptions. Several years ago, I came across a website debate on the topic, and one strong critic claimed that Suvorov’s theories had been totally debunked by American military historian David M. Glantz in Stumbling Colossus, published in 1998. But when I ordered and read the book I was sorely disappointed. Although purporting to refute Suvorov, the author seemed to ignore almost all of his central arguments, and merely provided a rather dull and pedantic recapitulation of the standard narrative I had previously seen hundreds of times, laced with a few rhetorical excesses denouncing the unique vileness of the Nazi regime. Most ironically, Glantz emphasizes that although Suvorov’s analysis of the titanic Russo-German military struggle had gained great attention and considerable support among both Russian and German scholars, it had been generally ignored in the Anglo-American world, and he almost seems to imply that it can probably be disregarded for that reason. Perhaps this attitude reflected the cultural arrogance of many American intellectual elites during Russia’s disastrous Yeltsin Era of the late 1990s.
A far superior book, generally supportive of Suvorov’s framework, was Stalin’s War of Annihilation, by prize-winning German military historian Joachim Hoffmann, originally commissioned by the German Armed Forces and published in 1995 with an English revised edition appearing in 2001. The cover carries a notice that the text was cleared by German government censors, and the author’s introduction recounts the repeated threats of prosecution he endured from elected officials and the other legal obstacles he faced, while elsewhere he directly addresses himself to the unseen government authorities who he knows are reading over his shoulder. When stepping too far outside the bounds of accepted history carries the serious risk that a book’s entire print-run will be burned and the author imprisoned, a reader must necessarily be cautious at evaluating the text since important sections have been skewed or preemptively excised in the interests of self-preservation. Evaluating scholarly debates on historical issues becomes difficult when one sides faces incarceration if their arguments are too bold.
Can we say whether Suvorov is right? Since our information gatekeepers of the English-language world have spent the last three decades closing their eyes and pretending that the Suvorov Hypothesis does not exist, the near-complete absence of any substantial reviews or critiques makes it very difficult for me to come to any definite conclusion. But based on the available evidence, I believe it is far more likely than not that Suvorov’s theories are at least substantially correct. And if so, our current understanding of World War II—the central formative event of our modern world—is entirely transformed.
Suvorov notes that treaties or pacts are traditionally named for the city in which they are signed—the Warsaw Pact, the Baghdad Pact, the Munich Agreement—and thus the so-called “Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact” signed in August 23, 1939 by which Hitler and Stalin agreed to the division of Poland should more properly be called “the Moscow Pact.” As a direct result of that agreement, Stalin gained half of Poland, the Baltic States, and various other advantages, including a direct border with Germany. Meanwhile, Hitler was punished by declarations of war from France and Britain, amid worldwide condemnation as a military aggressor. Although Germany and Russia both invaded Poland, the latter managed to avoid being dragged into any war with Poland’s erstwhile allies. Thus, the primary beneficiary of the Moscow Pact was clearly Moscow.
Given the long years of trench warfare on the Western front during the First World War, almost all outside observers expected the new round of the conflict to follow a very similar static pattern, gradually exhausting all sides, and the world has shocked when Germany’s innovative tactics allowed it to achieve a lightening defeat the allied armies in France during 1940. But at that point, Hitler regarded the war as essentially over, and was confident that the extremely generous peace terms he immediately offered the British would soon lead to a final settlement. As a consequence, he returned Germany to a regular peacetime economy, choosing butter over guns in order to maintain his high domestic popularity
Stalin, however, was under no such political constraints, and from the moment he had signed his long-term peace agreement with Hitler in 1939 and divided Poland, he ramped up his total-war economy to an even higher notch. Embarking upon an unprecedented military buildup, he focused his production almost entirely upon purely offensive weapons systems, while even discontinuing those armaments better suited for defense and dismantling his defensive lines of fortifications. By 1941, his production cycle was complete, and he made his plans accordingly.
And so, just as in our traditional narrative, we see that in the weeks and months leading up to Barbarossa, the most powerful offensive military force in the history of the world was quietly assembled in secret along the German-Russian border, preparing for the order that would unleash their surprise attack. The enemy’s unprepared air force was to be destroyed on the ground in the first days of the battle, and enormous tank columns would begin deep penetration thrusts, surrounding and trapping the opposing forces, achieving a classic blitzkrieg victory, and ensuring the rapid occupation of vast territories. But the forces preparing this unprecedented war of conquest were Stalin’s, and his military juggernaut would surely have seized all of Europe, probably soon followed by the remainder of the Eurasian landmass.
Then at almost the last moment, Hitler suddenly realized the strategic trap into which he had fallen, and ordered his heavily outnumbered and outgunned troops into a desperate surprise attack of their own on the assembling Soviets, fortuitously catching them at the very point at which their own final preparations for sudden attack had left them most vulnerable, and thereby snatching a major initial victory from the jaws of certain defeat. Huge stockpiles of Soviet ammunition and weaponry had been positioned close to the border to supply the army of invasion into Germany, and these quickly fell into German hands, providing an important addition to their own woefully inadequate resources.
The enormous and fully-militarized resources of the Soviet state, supplemented by the contributions of Britain and America, did eventually turn the tide of battle and lead to a Soviet victory, but Stalin ended up with only half of Europe rather than its entirety.
Suvorov argues that the fatal weakness of the Soviet system was its total inability to compete with non-Sovietized states in the peacetime production of civilian goods, and because such states had still survived after the war, the Soviet Union was doomed to eventual collapse.
Navrozov, the Chronicles reviewer, is a Russian Slav and therefore hardly favorable to the German dictator. But he closes his review with a remarkable statement:
Therefore, if any of us is free to write, publish, and read this today, it follows that in some not inconsequential part our gratitude for this must go to Hitler. And if someone wants to arrest me for saying what I have just said, I make no secret of where I live.
GENIUS EXPLAINS WITH FACTS WHY AND HOW ISRAEL DID 9 11
Former CIA Asset Exposes 911 Cover Up
Zero 2 Wealth